Breakfast at Tiffany’s (1961) Film Review by Gareth Rhodes

11-03-01_Breakfast-at-Tiffanys_foto-1

Breakfast at Tiffany’s (1961) Directed by Blake Edwards. With Audrey Hepburn and George Peppard.


Watching Breakfast at Tiffany’s for the first time, over fifty-years since its original release is a bit like visiting a gallery to see a famous painting. The iconic imagery is fused so inexorably into the cultural subconsciousness, that it holds a revered place outside of the context of the film. The classic Audrey Hepburn portrait, immortalising the actress to larger than life proportions is held aloft today as defining iconography for cinema and fashion.

Beyond what it has come to represent, there’s a good film. Blake Edwards’ cameras are as in love with Hepburn as the majority of the male characters. As New York socialite Holly Golightly, Hepburn captivates in a feisty role that displays great wit aside an undertone of veiled desperation as she scrapes through life as a high class prostitute.

Attempting to bring balance to Holly’s chaotic mind, is George Peppard’s Paul Varjak. Peppard is a sturdy presence, and it’s through his character that we get to know Holly’s scatterbrained dreamer. Heard against the sight of a 1950’s Manhattan backdrop, the refrains of Henry Mancini’s Moon River serve to heighten the sense of romance to places only a movie can reach.

Mickey Rooney’s Mr Yunioshi, complete with comedy teeth and regular explosions of manic energy, is an ill-fit for the piece. Not only is it a badly-misjudged Japanese stereotype, it’s also guilty of being not funny.

For a film that has echoed so much beauty, while informing generations of fashion choices, even today, it’s surprising to find such so much tragedy, albeit tragedy with a spring in its step. Hepburn positively fizzes the quick-fire script to life, and by the final rain-swept showdown, it’s hard not to admit you haven’t felt the sprinkling of a little Hollywood magic.

3.5/5 

Advertisements

About garethrhodes

Full-time lover of all things creative.
This entry was posted in Film Reviews and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s