Hannah and Her Sisters (1986) Film Review by Gareth Rhodes

Hannah and Her Sisters (1986) Directed by Woody Allen. With Barbara Hershey, Mia Farrow, Dianne Wiest, Woody Allen, Carrie Fisher, Michael Caine and Max Von Sydow.

hannah-and-her-sisters

All writers repeats themselves eventually. Even the great ones. If you can regularly produce writing as great as Woody Allen, though, then people will be very forgiving. By 1986, we knew what to expect from an Allen film.  He did, however, reveal that he had learned a lot about writing for women through his collaborations with Diane Keaton, and it is here with Hannah and Her Sisters, a new New York set tale (where else?) of romantic, interwoven family ties, that Allen demonstrates his evolution as a writer for the opposite sex.

Hannah (Mia Farrow) and her sisters Lee (Barbara Hershey) and Holly (Diane Weist) are the titular characters of the piece. Essentially an ensemble piece, the film takes place between two Thanksgiving holidays, focusing on a complex series of relationships and characters. Like much of Allen’s work, the nearest tag you’d give it is ‘drama/comedy’, with Allen once again casting himself as a version of himself, and to be perfectly honest, stealing the film from under everyone else’s nose.

The film took home three Oscars at the 1987 ceremony, two of which were acting honours for Michael Caine and Dianne Weist in supporting roles. Yet, it is Allen himself who proves the to be the most enjoyable and impressive aspect of it, playing a hypochondriac with an existential crisis. In a sense, it is two films. One that focuses on Hannah and her sisters, and another starring Woody Allen playing Hannah’s ex-husband. Part of the problem, is that whenever Allen isn’t on screen, we miss him. All of the humour flows through his character, and his famous comic delivery is so well honed that it easily overshadows the drama shared between the rest of the cast.

In a sense, it’s like watching a comedy sketch show; waiting for your favourite character to appear. It sounds disrespectful to the fine ensemble cast,  but Allen’s neurotic turn is so much fun that it’s hard not to feel mildly frustrated with some of drama, which does struggle to make its mark. It should really be called ‘Hannah’s Ex-Husband and Her Sisters. 3.5/5

 

Advertisements

About garethrhodes

Full-time lover of all things creative.
This entry was posted in Film Reviews, Woody Allen and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Hannah and Her Sisters (1986) Film Review by Gareth Rhodes

  1. Marshall says:

    I’d encourage you to return to this movie later. Time, and some reconsideration of just how the story works, really does wonders for this piece. I say this because I had a similar first reaction but this is now one of my all time favorite films.

    • garethrhodes says:

      Great comment. Thank you for your insight and input. It’s true our relationship with certain films can go through an evolution of sorts. I’ve grown to like films I had initially disliked. That said, I did like Hannah and Her Sisters, the problem was, I LOVED Woody’s bits.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s