Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982) Film Review by Gareth Rhodes

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982) Directed by Nicholas Meyer. With William Shatner, Leonard Nimoy, Ricardo Montalban, DeForest Kelley, Kirstie Alley, James Doohan and Paul Winfield.

TM, ? & Copyright © 2001 by Paramount Pictures. All Rights Reserved.

It’s a widely held opinion that Star Trek II is the best of the series to date. That said, by comparison, Star Trek: The Motion Picture would make any film look like a classic. In the three-years since we last met up with the crew of the Enterprise, they’ve all gone away and rediscovered their personalities. Gone are the achingly dull salutes to Kubrick’s 2001; replaced by a tone more fitting for that of adventure and excitement. Straight away, we’re plunged into a battle situation aboard the bridge of a vessel captained by Kirstie Alley, which turns out to be an elaborate training programme in which all the crew give up their time to role-play over-exaggerated deaths with real looking explosions and smoke. Maybe it’s a direct response to the portentous tone of its predecessor – whatever the reason, it’s a silly gag and doesn’t work.

Despite the naff execution of the intro, the idea of the battle simulation becomes relevant later in the plot and in truth, it’s good to see the actors appearing more relaxed and at home in their roles. The idea for Star Trek II takes its roots from an episode in the 1960’s television show titled ‘Space Seed‘, reintroducing the title character of Khan (Ricardo Montalban). With his New Romantic wig and pumped-up chest muscles, Khan is exactly what Star Trek needed. A charismatic villain with a purpose, fuelled by an unhealthy vendetta against William Shatner’s Captian Kirk.

As well as a strong antagonist, Star Trek II is more satisfying thanks to its underlying themes confronting ageing, death and friendship. It does what all good sequels should do; it takes the existing characters and builds on them and their relationships. It also remembers why people love Star Trek, returning to a more action orientated storyline while retaining the darker look of Star Trek: The Motion Picture.

As with all these films, the acting is a mixed bag of good and laughable. Walter Koenig has never been able to convincingly string a sentence together, while Kirstie Alley’s Saavik sounds like a parody of a Vulcan, rather than an actual one. James Horner’s main theme isn’t as swashbuckling as Jerry Goldsmith’s, but it still fits the piece well. Due to the high budget of Star Trek: The Motion Picture ($35m), many of the sets and props were re-used to keep the budget from spiralling, which allows ‘Khan’ to retain a pleasing sense of visual continuity.

The final third boldly goes where no Trek adventure has gone before or since, by adding some real dramatic weight. I won’t spoil it for any new viewers, but there is an unexpected sense of genuine emotion that perhaps explains why this instalment in the vast offering of related film and television is generally considered the greatest ‘Trek’ ever made. 3.5/5

Advertisements

About garethrhodes

Full-time lover of all things creative.
This entry was posted in Film Reviews and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982) Film Review by Gareth Rhodes

  1. cevans1982 says:

    Another good review sir, have to disagree with you on the intro though I quite like it and put in place when rumours of…the film’s climax leaked (can’t elaborate here without spoiling it for others but you know what I mean).

    The only slight issue I have with Wrath of Khan is Meyer’s over militaristic depiction of Starfleet (as Brice Greenwood’s Pike puts it in the 2009 reboot, “a humanitarian and peacekeeping armada”) which becomes a little overbearing in The Undiscovered Country. But it’s only a tiny niggle in what’s rightly considered the best of the franchise.

    • garethrhodes says:

      Good morning, great to hear from you again. Watching Star Trek II earlier this week proved to be timely for the very sad reason of Leonard Nimoy’s passing. The scene with Kirk speaking at his funeral seems all the more poignant now.

      I liked the idea of the intro, and it tied into a crucial part of the narrative, but it’s a bit of a false start for me.. Consoles blowing up. Starfleet officers dying dramatically, throwing themselves around the bridge for effect. The first time you see it, it’s fine, because we assume its a real battle situation. Repeat viewings are different, though. It seems a little silly and overcooked.

      I hadn’t thought about the militaristic depiction of Starfleet, but that’s a very interesting point you make. They are on the front foot, in those terms. Thank you for contributing again. Your input is valuable and always insightful. Also, great to meet another Trekkie.

      • cevans1982 says:

        No probs sir, always enjoy your reviews! I have the same thoughts on those closing moments of Wrath of Khan as well, very sad about the passing of Leornard Nimoy – but what better tribute than a viewing of this film?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s